Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1610 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1610 is 280 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 14% cheaper than FX-6200 - $37.0 vs $42.85
- Up to 12% better value when playing God of War than FX-6200 - $0.23 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 6 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6887 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6887 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |