Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1610 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1182 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $37.0 vs $48.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - $0.22 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10677 minutes ago
Intel OEM BV80605001908AK Core i7-860 Processor 2.8GHz 2.5GT/s 8MB LGA 1156 CPU OEM
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
