Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1772 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than FX-6200 - 507 vs 503 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than FX-6200 - $39.0 vs $42.85
- Up to 11% better value when playing World of Tanks than FX-6200 - $0.08 vs $0.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 649 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
507
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 649 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |