Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1772 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $42.85 vs $51.6
- Up to 12% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-7100T - $0.23 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than FX-6200 - 197 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3618 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3619 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |