Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1220 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130 - 181 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $41.0 vs $75.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
89.15770609318996%
Multi-Core
1960
86.72566371681415%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |