Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $51.6 vs $85.13
- Up to 39% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10105F - $0.19 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i3-7100T - 276 vs 269 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
269
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1834 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
61%
Price, $
$85.13
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |