Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 98 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 1400 - 198 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $42.88 vs $51.6
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-7100T - $0.23 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4992 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
186
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |