Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 1775 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G550 - 166 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - $49.0 vs $110.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 1400 - $0.31 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |