Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $49.0 vs $124.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10600KF - $0.33 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G550 - 161 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 12 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2490 minutes ago
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2491 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |