Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2592 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $49.0 vs $84.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.32 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G550 - 170 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Buy for $84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |