Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2412 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $49.0 vs $96.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-9400F - $0.39 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G550 - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 6 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2429 minutes ago
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |