Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3525 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $49.0 vs $94.98
- Up to 43% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-12100F - $0.2 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G550 - 269 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2089 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
57%
Price, $
$94.98
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |