Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1400 is 98 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G3930T - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1400 - $39.0 vs $110.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 5 1400 - $0.2 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |