Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $39.0 vs $136.5
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11400 - $0.23 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930T - 199 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Buy for $136.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |