Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $39.0 vs $135.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-8100 - $0.87 vs $2.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 24% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930T - 56 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
45
80.35714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4915 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
36.09958506224066%
Price, $
$135
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
44.01606425702811%
Multi-Core
948
27.841409691629952%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |