Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 471 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $19.98 vs $140.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3930T - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $19.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
47.56944444444444%
Multi-Core
948
19.582730840735387%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |