Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2181 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3770K - 239 vs 233 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $85.76 vs $175.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3770K - $0.36 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7699 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7697 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |