Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $39.0 vs $98.75
- Up to 38% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.38 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 58% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3930T - 163 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Buy for $98.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |