Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $39.0 vs $130.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.18 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3930T - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics - YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
