Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 2200G - 174 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $57.99 vs $130.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.33 vs $0.79 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $57.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |