Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1057 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i7-6900K - 151 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $56.99 vs $120.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-6900K - $0.38 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |