Buy on Amazon
$130
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400 is 130 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $130.0 vs $130.72
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 208 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.63 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics - YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.72
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $130.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
