Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 8% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G3900 - 194 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $39.9 vs $51.6
- Up to 19% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-7100T - $0.22 vs $0.27 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4852 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
179
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |