Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 490 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 2% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $39.0 vs $39.9
- Up to 3% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3900 - $0.3 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |