Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1282 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-6200 - $39.9 vs $42.85
- Up to 7% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than FX-6200 - $39.9 vs $42.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |