Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4350 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4350 is 488 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-4350 - $39.9 vs $51.6
- Up to 14% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-4350 - $0.25 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4350 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3900 - 179 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
157
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15470 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |