Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4350 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4350 is 932 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8120 - 161 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-4350 - $39.99 vs $51.6
- Up to 16% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4350 - $0.27 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3477 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3477 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |