Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 690 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i3-4130 - $39.99 vs $41.6
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 5% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8120 - 334 vs 317 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-8120 - $0.12 vs $0.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 125W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
334
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.6
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4130 3.4 3 FCLGA 1150 Processor BX80646I34130
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
