Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 932 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - $39.99 vs $45.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-4150 - $0.19 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than FX-8120 - 221 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |