Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-4300 is 377 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 17% cheaper than FX-4300 - $39.99 vs $48.02
- Up to 16% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-4300 - $0.31 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than FX-8120 - 130 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |