Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 377 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than FX-8120 - 504 vs 503 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-8120 - $48.02 vs $78.02
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |