Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $39.99 vs $93.74
- Up to 53% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i3-10100 - $0.16 vs $0.34 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than FX-8120 - 278 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9957 minutes ago
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9957 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |