Buy on Amazon
$48.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770 is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-4770 - $48.02 vs $74.95
- Up to 36% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-4770 - $0.27 vs $0.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-4300 - 180 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17679 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-4770 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ LGA 1150 8 MB Cache BX80646I74770
Buy for $74.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i7-4770
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
