Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $48.02 vs $81.39
- Up to 38% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.3 vs $0.48 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-4300 - 168 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18821 minutes ago
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |