Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $91.6 vs $104.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-10400F - $0.51 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Ryzen 3 3200G - 184 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
181
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
89%
Price, $
$104.99
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for $104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |