Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 180 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $69.82 vs $85.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Remnant II than Ryzen 3 3200G - 88 vs 84 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73794 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73793 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
76.34252539912917%
Multi-Core
3013
62.32933388498139%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |