Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1112 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 3200G - 228 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $78.02 vs $81.39
- Up to 6% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.34 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |