Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $78.02 vs $87.98
- Up to 9% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-10105F - $0.39 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 2% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 206 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
202
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
90%
Price, $
$87.98
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |