Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Core i3-2120T - 59 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $60.0 vs $85.13
- Up to 3% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-10105F - $1.4 vs $1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12992 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |