Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-3770 - 234 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $64.78 vs $98.18
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73838 minutes ago
Buy for $64.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73839 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
46.148555708390646%
Multi-Core
2299
51.40876565295171%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |