Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3570 - 168 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $59.14 vs $98.18
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73997 minutes ago
Buy for $59.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73997 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
656
45.11691884456671%
Multi-Core
1924
43.02325581395349%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |