Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than FX-4300 - 226 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $48.02 vs $85.13
- Up to 39% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i3-10105F - $0.23 vs $0.38 per FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
60%
Price, $
$85.13
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12772 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12772 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |