Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2837 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i3-3250 - 175 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $56.34 vs $85.13
- Up to 29% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-10105F - $0.35 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
71%
Price, $
$85.13
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13744 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
163
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |