Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 1249 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-530 - 145 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $45.0 vs $57.63
- Up to 20% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-3250 - $0.32 vs $0.4 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $57.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |