Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4460T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4460T is 265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-4460T - $48.0 vs $48.75
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 4% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3250 - 104 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3250 - $0.47 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
100
96.15384615384616%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
97.91666666666666%
Price, $
$48
100%
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50860 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
104
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.75
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50860 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
66.33416458852868%
Multi-Core
1130
51.598173515981735%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |