Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1304 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 0% better in Valorant than Core i3-3250 - 692 vs 690 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $39.0 vs $49.2
- Up to 14% better value when playing Valorant than Core i3-3250 - $0.06 vs $0.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $49.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
692
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |