Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 1677 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-3570 - $39.0 vs $69.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570 - $0.34 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930T - 118 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |