Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 2% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-4300 - 100 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than FX-4300 - $39.0 vs $48.02
- Up to 20% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than FX-4300 - $0.39 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13836 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |