Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 490 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 2% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $39.0 vs $39.9
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3930T - 146 vs 145 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13422 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |