Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1093 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3240 - 145 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-3240 - $39.9 vs $41.0
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |