Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 454 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - $41.0 vs $46.41
- Up to 9% better value when playing Control than Celeron G1820 - $0.21 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1914 minutes ago
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |